During the past few weeks I have been undertaking my thesis project in the Lund University fire laboratory. As there have been previous blog posts on lab sessions as part of the IMFSE fire dynamics module I have decided to focus this post on what it has been like to conduct an experimental thesis in one of the labs associated with the IMFSE program.
I initially decided on an experimental thesis because it gave me the opportunity to experience a prolonged period working within a fire lab. This was appealing because it is not a role that I have had much prior exposure in. Lab time and equipment is expensive, so a thesis project gives students a great opportunity to get some hands-on experience with running and managing projects in an experimental setting.
Taking on experimental work does come with risks; there is much more reliance on others to make sure the project keeps to schedule. Whether it comes to designing the test set up and methodology or finding suppliers and ordering in test materials the logistical constraints to the project can often be a major influence on the scope and success of the project. As well as the preparation work for your own experiments, it is also important to ensure that you have enough people working in the lab (a minimum of two people are required in the Lund lab at any one time) but not so many that there is no room to conduct your tests.
It can also throw up some unexpected problems that you would never think to consider. For me, a time constraint I had not accounted for was the amount of time it can take to complete the daily calibrations of the equipment. With a two-hour calibration time a significant chunk of each day was spent getting the equipment up and running. There were also plenty of hours spent trouble shooting when problems with equipment did arise. These can become stressful because you are not always sure if the problem will cause the project to come to an abrupt halt and, if so, how long for?
The working title of my thesis is ‘Burning material behaviour in hypoxic environments: An experimental study examining variable conditions’. By looking into material burning behaviours I am hoping to improve the depth of experimental research used to support the standards for oxygen reduction systems (used as part of a fire protection system strategy). I have been working with pure polymers as well as composite samples and exposing them to oxygen percentages ranging from 20.95% to 15%. This involved using two different test set-ups (cone calorimeter and controlled atmosphere cone calorimeter). The change of experimental arrangement involved additional procedural steps, calibrations, apparatus and risks, should things go wrong.
After running over 50 tests the procedure became habitual and flowed well. Even before full analysis of the results some interesting patterns were evident in the data collected. Sample thickness, irradiance and composite layer burning behaviour demonstrated a clear effect on the experimental outcomes.
Unfortunately, due to the international pandemic of Covid-19 the timeline scheduled for the experimental research that I had planned to complete was reduced from 3 to 2 weeks. This meant that I had to make decisions on which experiments to prioritise in order to collect enough data in the reduced time frame. It’s certainly not something that you think to include when writing up the project risks and limitations! It is however, an example of the sort of unavoidable limitations that can be imposed on projects, and why flexibility and contingency should always be considered to ensure that there is some solution in place should things go wrong. With 53/70 planned experiments conducted there was still enough data to complete the thesis as planned.
Following the work I’ve completed I have a few tips for anyone who plans on completing experimental work as part of their thesis work:
- Make sure the objectives and materials to be tested are well researched and justified prior to getting to the lab to avoid unnecessarily repeating tests.
- Contact suppliers of materials early on, as this can cause significant delays in shipping and supply particularly if the material tested is not commonly found and is in very particular sizes and shapes.
- If there seems to be a gap in the experimental research out there, it might be because it is logistically difficult or expensive to test with the apparatus available. Make sure to discuss plans with the lab team early on to discount variables that are not feasible within the project timescale.
- Keep, and continuously update, your records on the samples burnt, their size, weight etc. to make sure you have this information available when you come to analyse data. This evidence might help to explain any discrepancies you discover later down the line.
- Make use of the knowledge and experience of the lab team to help with troubleshooting and fixing equipment as this will speed up the process since they are likely to have come across the problem before.
- Expect the unexpected. No matter how much you plan there will be some aspects of testing that will not have been prepared for. Although I had done a large amount of preparatory reading on the plastic I intended to burn (ABS) I was not expecting it to be quite as sooty as it turned out to be. This meant that the balston filter and hepa vent needed to be constantly checked and changed. When the supply of balston filters ran low and more needed to be ordered this added an unexpected risk of slowing down the project. A similar issue also occurred with nitrogen cylinders for the hypoxic test scenarios.
- Be prepared to spend a not insignificant amount of time cleaning sample holders particularly if you are burning plastic samples! (do NOT burn ABS is you want to avoid a days work of post experimental cleaning)
Work closely and support other IMFSE students who are also conducting work in the lab as you will often need to coordinate when to use equipment, and make sure that air and water supplies are available for different apparatus during calibration. By communicating and helping each other you can be more of a help than a hindrance with each other’s work.
Finally, I thought I’d borrow one of the photos from Haydn’s setup (thanks Haydn) as it’s a bit more photogenic then the what you can get from the controlled oxygen chamber!